Monday, February 09, 2015

A dribble of $WWE Stock Analysis



Here is the $WWE stock against their annual average (by calendar year). You can see how huge that crest & fall for 2014 was driven by the exceptional expectations around the domestic TV rights deal (which ultimately didn't deliver as high as WWE or analysts hoped) and the initial enthusiasm about the viability of the WWE Network.

I was curious what happens in the quarter after WWE announces their fiscal results, namely - what happens in the post-WM quarter?


It's a very mixed bag. Some years we're up. Some years we're down. (Keep in mind that this chart has been time changed so that we're looking at the period following the release of results. So, we're actually in Q3 CY 2014 right now because the Q4 CY 2014 results hasn't been released yet.)

I also took a quick look at what your index would look like if you bought $WWE stock and wanted to hold it less than a year. This doesn't include stock splits or dividends or the fancy jazz that a real analysis would include. It's just a quick look at the average price in a month, and how that compares for the next 12 months.


For this chart, I excluded 1999-2000 and all of 2014. I felt that those two periods had a lot of distortion going on with them.

I'm very surprised to see December up for every month. Maybe I screwed something up.

Row Labels Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Avg
1999      24.00      22.54      16.40            20.20
2000      15.28      11.92      14.50      15.31      17.24      17.72      21.24      19.98      20.36      14.93      14.30      14.42            16.45
2001      18.91      16.03      12.75      13.30      13.21      12.61      13.76      11.74      11.61      11.35      11.95      12.74            13.32
2002      13.71      13.50      15.10      14.79      14.89      13.84      11.08        9.93        9.25        7.66        8.33        8.46            11.68
2003        8.17        8.14        7.89        8.33        9.28      10.06        9.81        9.74      10.19      10.69      11.31      12.33             9.68
2004      13.59      13.40      13.38      14.80      12.42      12.85      12.73      12.04      12.14      12.21      12.72      11.97            12.85
2005      12.31      12.37      12.30      11.59      10.53      10.41      12.00      12.29      12.94      12.68      13.06      14.61            12.25
2006      14.87      15.03      16.63      17.08      17.84      17.03      16.66      15.97      16.85      16.76      16.08      16.53            16.46
2007      16.19      16.15      15.87      16.62      17.91      17.09      16.07      14.63      14.83      15.24      15.10      14.89            15.88
2008      14.30      16.58      18.28      18.57      16.68      15.79      15.97      16.11      15.76      14.38      12.00      11.28            15.48
2009      10.46        9.47      10.55      11.31      11.62      13.02      12.94      14.24      14.16      13.81      15.34      15.69            12.76
2010      16.06      16.29      17.49      17.88      16.80      16.27      15.98      14.57      13.99      13.81      13.86      14.29            15.60
2011      13.44      12.27      12.66      11.73      10.39        9.65        9.92        9.38        9.12        9.98        9.86        9.75            10.66
2012        9.57        9.60        8.91        8.14        8.38        7.70        7.77        8.33        8.61        8.20        7.99        8.01             8.43
2013        8.19        8.53        8.66        8.91        9.29        9.87      10.82      10.10      10.04      11.37      13.66      15.04            10.38
2014      18.96      23.27      29.14      22.78      15.02      11.50      12.14      14.11      14.47      13.60      12.36      11.62            16.50
2015      11.15      12.64            11.44

It is remarkable that with the exception of 2004 and 2008, the Dec vs. Nov number was average of +4% and between -1% and +12%. 

But all of this is just someone playing with a couple numbers from Yahoo Finance with little stock financial training. I would take it with an enormous grain of salt.

No comments: