Friday, March 07, 2014

The Mystery of the Soaring Stock Price

WWE Stock PriceCloseChg vs
 Last Month
Friday, September 06, 2013$10.20 -2%
Monday, October 07, 2013$10.89 7%
Wednesday, November 06, 2013$12.72 17%
Friday, December 06, 2013$14.45 14%
Monday, January 06, 2014$15.48 7%
Thursday, February 06, 2014$22.70 47%
Thursday, March 06, 2014$29.80 31%



https://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&chdd=1&chds=1&chdv=1&chvs=maximized&chdeh=0&chfdeh=0&chdet=1394154377411&chddm=48484&chls=IntervalBasedLine&q=NYSE:WWE&ntsp=1&ei=iBsZU6iiDISmqgHcDQ

WWE Stock Price has been going up, up, up. 

 Not only does this ensure a steady stream of terrible wrestling-related puns on finance websites ...but provides plenty of vexing consternation for me as I try to figure out WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON?

I've followed WWE Financials pretty closely for awhile.  (Just as my pals about the awful podcasts I used to do back in 2007 when I was on cold medicine and discussing the 10-Q statement.)  I scour the Annual Reports, I keep up with latest gossip on their Television Negotiations, I read the in-ring rumors and I follow the (free) trials and tribulations with WWE Network subscribership.  Yet, I am still confused at what's really going on!

Let's start with the latest breakdown of 2013 WWE Revenue:

Revenue201320122011Assessment
Domestic TV Rights$105.9 $88.9 $80.3 Currently negotiating; Announce by April
Domestic Live Events$81.4 $72.1 $64.9
Domestic PPV$66.9 $66.4 $61.3 Big impact from WWE Network
Int'l TV Rights$55.0 $50.6 $51.2 Renewed BSkyB (UK), India upcoming
Licensing$43.6 $46.3 $54.4
Int'l Live Events$30.1 $31.6 $39.8
Home Entertainment$24.3 $33.0 $30.4 Expect some impact from WWE Network
Venue Merchandise$19.4 $18.8 $18.3
WWE.com$23.0 $19.7 $12.5 Possible impact from WWE Network
Int'l PPV$15.6 $17.2 $17.0 Future Int'l WWE Network impact
WWEShop$15.5 $14.8 $15.6
WWE Studios$10.8 $7.9 $20.9 $54M in impairment charges since 2007
Misc.$10.8 $10.7 $9.6
Magazine Publishing$5.7 $6.0 $7.7 Dropped $10.8M since 2007
Total$508.0 $484.0 $483.9

In 2013, WWE revenue was $508M yet net income was a paltry $2.8M - the company was beset by WWE Network preparation (spent $23M in three years) and WWE Studios impairment costs (another $11.7M).

Still, the stock continues to rise; really the climb began right after the quiet Q3 conference call on Halloween morning where Vince promised great TV negotiation results (and said they could put him in a hammerlock if they failed.)

In terms of what's new to WWE this year, I can only think of two real factors:
 There's a ton of buzz about how innovative and game-changing the WWE Network is.  But a true evaluation of the over-the-top service would also note that it's controversial and risky.

The Fundamentals aren't changing.
  • Wrestlemania lacks a marque draw - nothing on the scale of Rock versus Cena (I/II) battles
  •  International Revenues are becoming less and less significant.  (See chart above on attendance.)
    WWE North American Attendance average surpassed the International Attendance average for the first time in a decade!
  • The previous top draws from the Biggest Raw Ratings Draws in 2011-2013 like the Rock and CM Punk aren't with the company currently.  We still have John Cena, Paul Heyman/Brock Lesnar and Triple H but new superstars haven't done much as the return of Batista was a one-and-done ratings blip and even bringing Hulk Hogan back to television didn't have a noticeable impact.  Bryan Daniel showed signs up being a rating draw but he's clearly a distant #2 to top guys like John Cena when it comes to live events.
  • Raw Ratings for Jan/Feb have been average (actually slightly lower than past years). 
  • New Television money isn't coming in until Q4 2014 (Domestic) and Q1 2015 (International) so financial forecast for 2014 is not looking very rosy.
  • Growing TV Rights have been because of new programming such as Total Divas and adding a 3rd hour of Monday Night Raw.  Shows like Main Event on Ion haven't impressed that television network and CW's Saturday Morning Slam wasn't even renewed.  WWE couldn't find buyers for Superstars or NXT previously so those were just international/OTT shows.
Historically, domestic PPV revenue was broken into three camps of buyers:
  1. Hardcore Fans (110,000) - 12x (all the monthly PPV) = spent $45+/month
  2. Regular Fans (290,000) - 3x (Royal Rumble, Summer Slam, Wrestlemania) = spent $12+/month 
  3. Occasional fans (260,000) - 1x (Wrestlemania) = spent $5+/month
Converting all of these fans into regular WWE Network susbcribers (660k x $10 x 12 months) generates $79.2M which is +$10M higher than 2013's domestic PPV, but that's a huge investment to barely replacing the PPV revenue (and hurt the WWE.com and Home Entertainment revenue).  It's not pure profit either because they're still paying for the PPV production.  And most importantly, they still need more than 300,000 new subscribers above that PPV base just to hit the million subscriber break-even point.  (They're getting some of that by pulling European fans into the domestic launch, but that just hurts their projections for the international launch in 9-18 months time.)

In fact, for 60% of the PPV fans that would hypothetically convert to the WWE Network, those fans were already spending more than $10/month annually so it's not a true "savings" to those fans. (WWE only got half of that revenue, which was what drove WWE wild and made them balk at sharing PPV revenue or premium channel revenue with the MVPDs.)  More than half of WWE's domestic PPV revenue comes from their most hardcore fans, and clearly those fans would have tolerated even higher prices for the WWE Network since they were already paying more than $45/month.  WWE essentially offered a price decrease to the majority of their regular fans.  What I'm waiting for is their comprehensive marketing campaign on how they're going to lure back lapsed fans beyond just promoting the WWE Network on their television shows, emails blasts and word-of-mouth through friends and occasional major media coverage.

For a project (WWE Network) that has $55M in costs before they even factor in the $60M in cannibalized revenue, I'm still not convinced that the WWE Network will be profitable in 2014.  That's not to say it's not a worthwhile venture - as a fan, I appreciate the opportunity to transform how many PPVs I watch annually, and it keeps me more engaged with the product.  There's certainly an important, yet hard-to-define halo effect from launching the WWE Network.  Perhaps more people will attend Live Events or some fans will return to watching programming weekly.  However, as an analyst, I view a project like WWE Network as, at best, break-even in terms of OIBDA.  That doesn't strike me as the sort of venture that should send the stock price skyrocketing.

So, if WWE Network isn't the main driver of growth, that just leaves the WWE Domestic TV Rights negotiations.  I went through the history and details elsewhere about why I think WWE will re-sign with NBCU, but I don't think they'll hit their massive rates increases above $220M (doubling rates).
The simplest reason is that expensive programming (like Sports) is paid for by advertising and, to a smaller extent, promoting other shows on the network.  Frankly, WWE stinks at both.  Wrestling fans are fickle and don't support most other shows.  The CPMs wrestling gets for the eyeballs they deliver are appalling. Advertisers don't believe the WWE Universe is going to spend the money.  If WWE has been successful in shopping around a new narrative, that would be a substantial win for the company. But I haven't seen any evidence of that, yet - at least not in print.  NBCU at least has some ideas on how to shake-up advertising, that could outline why WWE might get better rates in 2015 and beyond.

Originally, WWE's decision date for Domestic TV was supposed to be March 4 with an announcement coming in April.  It's unclear whether that was a firm deadline, or just posturing on their part so they could get things done early.  I believe that while the exclusive negotiation period with NBCU has expired, NBCU still has matching-rights which allow them to retain WWE if they pony up the same amount as the other bidders (top contenders assumed to be Viacom and Fox).

However, as it's plays out right now, the WWE is riding high. They're at their peak stock price and have vastly increased the McMahon family's wealth.  I can only conclude that investors seem confident that WWE is about to score a big win on TV rights (and to a lesser extent jaw-dropping WWE Network signup numbers).  I am just a lot more pessimistic.  

Drop me a line (twitter: @mookieghana), comments section or email (indeedwrestling@gmail.com) and explain what I'm missing.  I do appreciate it!

Wednesday, March 05, 2014

Oodles of Articles

Pieces that I've written and recently published on other websites:
2/18/2014 WhatCulture: WWE Raw: 16 Biggest Raw Ratings Movers
2/20/2014 WhatCulture: 10 Controversies of the WWE Network
2/23/2014 F4W/WO: 2013 WWE Financials Examined Wrestlenomics-style
2/24/2014 Voices of Wrestling: WWE 2013 & PPV Breakdown
2/25/2014 Voices of Wrestling: WWE Network Launch Day Estimation
2/25/2014 WhatCulture: WWE: 8 Modern PPVs That Performed Miserably
2/27/2014 WhatCulture: WWE Network Launch: All your Key Questions Answered
2/28/2014 Whatculture: 20 Most Prolific PPV Wrestlers Of All Time (WCW/WWF)
3/03/2014 F4W/WO: WWE Network 7 Days Later
3/05/2014 Whatculture: 14 WWE Network Risks That WWE Worries About
3/05/2014 Whatculture: WWE’s Current 15 Year Stock High Is Tied To Their Domestic TV Future
3/07/2014 Voices of Wrestling: The Mystery of the Soaring Stock Price
3/10/2014 Whatculture: 10 Ways WWE Can Maintain Their Current Business Success

Updated 83-page PDF about the WWE Network.


In terms of original material, Dave's done a stellar job in the Observer. Almost every issue in the past few months has talked about the WWE Network and/or the WWE Finances.

Here's some other original articles that I've relied on heavily for new information. While almost daily I look for new material, and I'm still discovering articles that I've missed (such as the AdAge one) that provide good insight on the chasm between TV/Advertising executives and WWE/Investors.

My list of other Good Reading Material regarding the Domestic TV Rights Negotiations:

Bonnie Hammer
10/9/2001 CNN: Bonnie Hammer: She is Sci Fi
Forbes: Power Women #61: Bonnie Hammer
12/19/2011 NYTimes: The Queen of Cable TV
WWE TV Rights
11/1/2013 Forbes: WWE's Hidden Gem (Chris Bevilacqua talks up WWE)
1/24/2014 NYPost: NBCUniversal, out to keep WWE, mulls Hall of Fame
1/29/2014 Hollywood Reporter: WWE, BSkyB Extend U.K. TV Deal
2/18/2014 LA Times: WWE shopping 'Raw,' 'Smackdown' and other TV properties (mentions that WWE had hired Bevilacqua)
2/18/2014 Variety: WWE’s ‘Raw,’ ‘SmackDown’ Could Find New Homes as Negotiating Window with NBCU Expires
2/19/2014 AdAge: WWE Will Struggle to Position Itself as Live Sports
2/24/2014 SEC: WWE 2013 Annual Report
2/25/2014 Motley Fool: Why WWE Might Not Get the TV Deal it Wants(includes quotes from Wrestling Observer's Ben Miller)
3/7/2014 Bloomberg Businessweek: WWE Expects New Cable-TV Deal by Early May, CFO Barrios Says

Sunday, March 02, 2014

Wrestlers who were in the ring with the World Champion (Omni)

Dave Meltzer, on the F4W/WO message board wrote:
You know what would be a project: Who had the most main events over a career combining --
  1. PPVs (every group that had them although you could argue TNA & ECW were never really major league at that level)
  2. MSG house shows (prior to monthly PPVs when MSG house shows were the second biggest priority)
  3. Atlanta Omni main events (until WCW went monthly)
  4. Greensboro Coliseum main events (until 1988)
  5. St. Louis main events (until 1985)
  6. Chicago main events (until 1985)
  7. Los Angeles main events (until 1975)
  8. SF Cow Palace main events (1961-76)
  9. Minneapolis main events (until 1985)
  10. Toronto main events (until 1984)
  11. Montreal main events (until International closed)
  12. Japanese Dome & Stadium shows
  13. Sumo Hall, Budokan Hall, Osaka Furitsu Gym/Castle Hall (or Nagoya Aiichi Gym or both)
  14. Dallas Reunion Arena (during its era)
  15. Houston (until 1986)
  16. New Orleans Superdome
I looked at prolific WWE & WCW PPV performers in my latest WhatCulture article.
I looked at MSG House shows in yesterday's IndeedWrestling blog.
I don't have results for all of these arenas listed, but there is information on The History of WWE concerning Omni shows from 1973-1996.  [1970s, 1980s, 1990s]

Main Events is always a tricky term.  Is it the last match? Is it the match that had the world champion involved?  I look at 1973-1993 and normalized names.

Let's start with who was in the matches that included the World Champion:






Another method of scoring "main events" is looking at people who were in the top quarter of the card.  Basically, I'll give a wrestler a point whenever they're in the final matches.  For instance, on an 8 match card, the wrestlers in the final three matches (#6/#7/#8) each score a point.


The people that show up higher on the "top of the card" list but much lower (or not at all) on the World Champ list are:
  • Bobby Eaton
  • Terry Gordy
  • Stan Hansen
  • Bob Armstrong
  • Robert Gibson
  • Butch Reed
  • Dick Murdoch
  • Buddy Roberts
  • Roddy Piper
  • Barbarian
  • Dustin Rhodes
 People that are higher on the "World Champ" list but not as high on the overall "top of the card" list were:
  • Vader
  • Mongolian Stomper
  • Baron Von Raschke
  • Great Muta
  • Ken Patera
  • Leroy Brown
  • Spoiler

Saturday, March 01, 2014

Wrestlers who were in the ring with the World Champion (MSG)

Dave Meltzer, on the F4W/WO message board wrote:
You know what would be a project: Who had the most main events over a career combining --
  1. PPVs (every group that had them although you could argue TNA & ECW were never really major league at that level)
  2. MSG house shows (prior to monthly PPVs when MSG house shows were the second biggest priority)
  3. Atlanta Omni main events (until WCW went monthly)
  4. Greensboro Coliseum main events (until 1988)
  5. St. Louis main events (until 1985)
  6. Chicago main events (until 1985)
  7. Los Angeles main events (until 1975)
  8. SF Cow Palace main events (1961-76)
  9. Minneapolis main events (until 1985)
  10. Toronto main events (until 1984)
  11. Montreal main events (until International closed)
  12. Japanese Dome & Stadium shows
  13. Sumo Hall, Budokan Hall, Osaka Furitsu Gym/Castle Hall (or Nagoya Aiichi Gym or both)
  14. Dallas Reunion Arena (during its era)
  15. Houston (until 1986)
  16. New Orleans Superdome
I looked at prolific WWE & WCW PPV performers in my latest WhatCulture article.
I don't have results for all of these arenas listed, but there is information on The History of WWE concerning MSG shows from 1963-2013.  [1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, 2010s]

Main Events is always a tricky term.  Is it the last match? Is it the match that had the world champion involved?  I look at 1963-1995 and normalized names.

Let's start with who was in the matches that included the World Champion:






Another method of scoring "main events" is looking at people who were in the top quarter of the card.  Basically, I'll give a wrestler a point whenever they're in the final matches.  For instance, on an 8 match card, the wrestlers in the final three matches (#6/#7/#8) each score a point.


Longer version of the List.

The people that show up higher on the "top of the card" list but much lower (or not at all) on the World Champ list are:
  • Tony Garea
  • Bobo Brazil
  • Ivan Putski
  • Mr Fuji
  • Tito Santana
  • Haystacks Calhoun
  • Dominic DeNucci
  • Tony Atlas
  • Afa
  • Davey Boy Smith
  • Rick Martel
  • Rocky Johnson
  • Dino Bravo
  • Haku
  • Junkyard Dog
A lot of these wrestlers are tag team guys.

People that are higher on the "World Champ" list but not as high on the overall "top of the card" list were:
  • Don Muraco
  • Freddie Blassie
  • Harley Race
  • Stan Hansen
  • Paul Orndorff
  • Sheik
  • Kevin Nash
  • Buddy Rogers
  • Bobby Duncum
  • Lex Luger
  • King Curtis Iaukea
  • Bruiser Brody
  • Johnny Valentine
  • Gene Kiniski
Certainly some heavy hitter in there, but some of these weren't longer term WWWF/WWF guys.

Friday, February 28, 2014

Hogan's value to WCW PPV

Dave Meltzer, publisher of the Wrestling Observer newsletter, recently posted on the WONF4W message board:
Hogan pre-NWO was hardly a waste of money. PPV business made a ridiculous turnaround from pre-Hogan levels. Every Hogan house show drew tons more than anything WCW was doing without him.
He didn't turn ratings around much, but he was making millions and he drew more than he was making.
To illustrate Dave's point about WCW PPVs, here's WCW attendance & PPV buys/buyrate numbers 1987-2001.



Since readers tend to get grumpy when we talk about "buyrates", I've taken the liberty of converting the buyrates to buys. (I discuss the buys/buyrate issue in my entries on WCW and WWF PPV estimates.)
Keep in mind that the Universe of possible PPV subscribers wasn't static throughout this period, so there are more homes capable of getting a PPV in 1996 than 1991. However, that's one reason that intra-year comparisons are important, and tell a strong story too.

Baseline
1991: 5 non-Hogan Shows (avg 146k buys)
1992: 6 non-Hogan Shows (avg 111k buys)
1993: 7 non-Hogan Shows (avg 94k buys)

1994: 3 Hogan Shows (avg 189k buys) vs 4 non-Hogan Shows (avg 111k buys) = +69%
1995: 6 Hogan Shows (avg 141k buys) vs 3 non-Hogan Shows (avg 89k buys) = +59%
1996: 7 Hogan Shows (avg 251k buys) vs 3 non-Hogan Shows (avg 175k buys) = +43%
1997: 7 Hogan Shows (avg 348k buys) vs 5 non-Hogan Shows (avg 210k buys) = +66%
1994-1997: 42 Hogan Shows (avg 244k buys) vs 67 non-Hogan Shows (avg 152k buys) = +60%

When Hulk Hogan was wrestling on a WCW PPV, on average, there was an increase of more than 90,000 buys.  With 42 PPV events at $25/PPV (I'd have to go back to find the real PPV price) and the cable company taking half, that's $47M+ in PPV revenue for WCW driven by the Hogan on PPV effect.

Continuing with business comparisons, things are pretty equal in 1998, but honestly the company is hot.

1998: 8 Hogan Shows (avg 365,500 buys) vs 4 non-Hogan Shows (avg 341,250 buys) = +7%
1999: 6 Hogan Shows (avg 276,500 buys) vs 6 non-Hogan Shows (avg 205,000 buys) = +35%

Hogan's impact was minimal in 2000, but keep in mind the company was plummeting. While Hogan was on some these PPVs, he wasn't really the main event.  (Using the helpful spreadsheet from ProWrestlingHistory.) For instance:

* Superbrawl X (Sid/Hall/Jarrett was top; Hogan was wrestling Lex Luger as the "Featured Attraction")
* Slamboree 2000 (Jarrett/DDP&Arquette was top; Singles Match (Special Referee: Eric Bischoff) Kidman vs Hogan)
* GAB2000 (Jarrett/Nash was top; Retirement Match Vs. Title Shot Match (Special Referee: Horace Hogan) Kidman vs Hogan)

Basically, you end up with:
2000: Hogan on Top (80,000 buys avg in 2 shows), Hogan on Card (73,250 avg in 3 shows), no Hogan (80,000 in 7 shows).

So, it seems clear that Hulk Hogan was a real difference maker from 1994-1997.  The company grew strong in 1998 and 1999 but that was on the back of the nWo angle where Hogan played an integral role.

Other relevant WCW Links:

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

WWE Launch Day Subscriptions Estimates





The WWE Network launched yesterday. (For a full chronology of the lead-up to this huge event, please check out the other sixteen pieces I've written about it.)

Launch day was predictably bumpy. There were many complaints about access issues prompting the WWE to quickly throw partner MLB Advanced Media under the bus.
http://nypost.com/2014/02/24/wwes-streaming-network-slammed-on-debut/

“Major League Baseball Advanced Media (MLBAM), WWE’s technology partner, was overwhelmed and their systems have been unable to process most orders since 9 a.m. due to demand for WWE Network,” the company said in a statement.“MLBAM has been working aggressively to resolve this issue,” it added.
A Variety article published that afternoon added:
According to MLBAM, the initial demand at 9 a.m. Eastern exceeded anything the company had seen in its history and overloaded the company’s e-commerce processing system. Reps for WWE and MLBAM said all issues were resolved by mid-afternoon Eastern time.

For a few hours when you ordered the WWE Network, you received a "confirmation email" from the WWE. Here's mine from 2:35 PM (Central Timezone):



This was very interesting as Ian Hamilton pointed out, it appeared they were giving out sequential numbers starting somewhere north of 11100000. By Tracking them, as David Bixenspan set out to do, we could informally track subscriptions leading into Wrestlemania.... That is, until WWE wised up to our scheme.

Still, between 8 AM and 4 PM EST, WWE Confirmation Emails were sent out with Order Numbers. With more than fifty respondents, we had a sufficient dataset to start looking at the patterns:


Basically, the first order we heard about was 8:12 AM EST (11187725) and the last order was 4:02 PM EST (11317813).  So, our data suggests that over the course of about eight hours (8 AM-4 PM), there was more than 130,000 signups.

Observations:
  1. Things really seemed to crash between 9 AM EST and 1 PM EST.  It seems that less than 11,000 orders were processed during those four hours.  (We have 8:59 AM EST at 11199730 and 1:18 PM EST at 11210618.)
  2. It's not completely clear what the starting number was.  If we assume 11100000, then there was almost 90,000 orders prior to 8:12 AM EST.  That seems like a lot to me, especially for a service that wasn't officially online yet.  If that were true, it would imply 8AM-4PM signups were almost 70% higher (more like 220,000+).  I am becoming dubious about assuming that 11000001 equals order #1.  
  3. 1:15 PM to 1:45 PM EST was probably catching up on the backlog of orders. Nearly 50,000 orders were processed in about twenty-five minutes (almost 33 orders per second).  This was really more likely the sum total of 4.5 hours worth of orders.
  4. Things seem a lot more steady from 2 PM to 4 PM EST.  Order numbers jumped by about 46,500 during the final two hours of tracking with fairly similar hourly numbers: 2 PM to 3 PM: +24,000, 3 PM to 4 PM: +22,500.    
  5. We run out of data just when things got interesting.  Did the pace of sign-ups increase again after 5 PM EST when people finished school and work and headed home?  What was the effect of all of the plugs for the Network during Monday Night Raw?  Did we see a post-show swell?
If we pretend that there was no change in order momentum (or that it averaged out from low to high to low again), the midpoint model would suggest that around 12:01 AM on 2/25/2014 the WWE Network final confirmation number would have been around 11439186.  That would end day one at a little over 251,000 signups (plus however many signed up before 8:15 AM EST.)  Some may choose to read that 439,186 signups, but I think that's way too generous. Either way, the point is rather moot because our trendline only covers about four hours of real data (8 AM-9 AM and 1 PM-4 PM).

Really, what this data tells us is that hardcore fans because they're the ones that are most likely to have signed up at the beginning of the service (say between launch and 2 PM), about 80,000 people signed up.  That's in line with what we would expect from "hardcore fans".

Also, even though the WWE Network launch was only supposed to be for US customers, international (especially Canadian and UK) customers found work-arounds (signing up through AppleTV, using Paypal, utilizing VPN/Proxy servers).  It's hard to really know how many int'l users "snuck" through, but consider that in our survey almost 17% of the users responded using a GMT timestamp.  I hardly believe that geographically our sample group was representative of the WWE Network usership at large, but it suggests that it would be entirely feasible that thousands, even tens of thousands, of first-day signups were from non-domestic customers.



> So, in your" expert" opinion, what's your guess for first-day signups for the WWE Network?

I'd guess that the WWE Network did somewhere between 250k and 350k signups for day one.

  • If we trust the survey data, we know they had at least 130,000 by 4 PM.
  • Going forward, just averaging 16,000/hour would have essentially doubled subscriptions to 260k by midnight.
  • If they had a huge influx of new subscribers (say almost 50k/hour) between 9 PM and 11 PM, they could have hit 350k by midnight.
> Is that a good number?

Hard to say.  (Easy answer, right?)
  • If they have 300,000 first-day subscribers that aren't just using the free trial and plan on actually subscribing (along with auto-renew), that's a decent number, especially since we're more than a month away from Wrestlemania.
  • It will be important to look at conversions for "free trial" subscribers in one week.  Will we see a big influx in early March from new converts (or word-of-mouth)?  What happens in August when the first 6-months ran out?  How many people chose "auto-renew"?
  • They still need to hit a million subscribers just to make the project break-even.  This week was the low-hanging fruit - hardcore fans, post-PPV buzz, post-Olympics big Raw with Hogan & UT & Brock drawing eyeballs. I figure new subscribers will trickle to a few thousand each day before surging again the week before Wrestlemania.
  • My guess two months ago for full-year WWE Subscriber average was 415,000.  That wasn't to say they wouldn't be above 415k for part of the year (obviously during the WM season), but by the end of 2014, I thought they'd only be in the 400k-500k range.  I'm not sure that anything has convinced me otherwise... at least not yet.
  • While it was inevitable that international subscribers were going to work hard to get in on the US launch, I don't believe that WWE was including those subscribers in their initial estimates for the overseas markets.  They needed at least 250,000 in those markets to break-even and I figure by Wrestlemania somewhere between 5%-10% of those int'l fans will may already be subscribing as "domestic" customers.

Do you have an order number you'd like to contribute to the mix?  Please submit through the Google Form at tinyurl.com/wweorders

Also, did anyone sign up for the free trial and also get a confirmation number?  I'd like to answer that question.

As far as we can tell, WWE stopped putting order numbers in the confirmation emails around 4 PM EST.

-Chris Harrington
email: chris.harrington@gmail.com
twitter: @mookieghana

Other recent pieces I've written:
WhatCulture: 10 Controversies of the WWE Network
Figure Four/Wrestling Observer: WWE Financials broken down #wrestlenomics style
Voices of Wrestling: 2013 WWE PPV Review & Financial Discussion

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Wrestling Observer Word Clouds

I've become addicted to making word clouds on Wordle.  Specifically, I've been feeding in lots of Wrestling Observer text to see what happens.

1991-1992 Wrestling Observers


2012-2013 Wrestling Observers

MMA 2008-2014 (UFC, WEC, Affliction, Strikeforce, K-1/DREAM, Bellator, Elite XC)


TNA 2008-2013



Japan 2008-2013 (New Japan, All Japan, Dragon Gate, Hustle, Wrestle-1)



Mexico (AAA, CMLL, PDM) 2008-2013

Seven Thoughts about WWE 2013 Financials

We're in the middle of a big week for the WWE.

WWE CEO Vince McMahon and WWE CFO George Barrios led a conference call discussing 4th quarter earnings on Thursday (2/20). On Sunday (2/23), WWE will hold the last traditional PPV, Elimination Chamber.  The next day, at Monday Night Raw (2/24) Hulk Hogan will return to WWE television and that evening the WWE Network goes live!  (And let's not forget that WWE is still in the midst of important television rights negotiations. They're also trying to soothe angry MVPDs like Dish Network to convince them to carry Wrestlemania.)

Let's examine the state of the WWE going into an eventful and transformative period for the company.

Read the whole article at Wrestling Observer / Figure Four Online 

http://www.f4wonline.com/more/more-top-stories/96-wwe/35580-on-wrestling-2013-wwe-financials-examined-wrestlenomics-style


Thursday, February 20, 2014

Pure WWF/WWE Financials 1994-2013

I've been assembling WWF/WWE Financials to provide more comprehensive looks.

Pure WWF/WWE Financials 1994-2013


START5/1/19945/1/19955/1/19965/1/19975/1/1998
END
4/30/1995
4/30/1996
4/30/1997
4/30/1998
4/30/1999
FISCAL YEAR
FY1995
FY1996
FY1997
FY1998
FY1999
PPV EVENTS
5
12
12
12
12
PPV BUYS
1,868,900
2,831,700
2,252,200
2,936,100
5,365,100
REVENUE
$87.35
$85.82
$81.86
$126.23
$250.34
Net income (loss)
$(4.43)
$3.20
$(6.51)
$8.47
$56.03
EBIDTA

$7.71-($4.96)$12.15$58.93
ATTENDANCE
1,163,259
931,954
1,060,740
1,576,112
2,273,701
EVENTS
347
247
199
218
199

START5/1/19995/1/20005/1/20015/1/20025/1/2003
END
4/30/2000
4/30/2001
4/30/2002
4/30/2003
4/30/2004
FISCAL YEAR
FY2000
FY2001
FY2002
FY2003
FY2004
EVENTS
12
12
12
12
12
PPV BUYS
6,884,600
8,010,400
7,135,464
5,378,100
5,604,000
REVENUE
$377.90
$438.14
$409.62
$374.30
$374.91
Profit Contribution
$158.34
$188.86
$158.50
$136.90
$167.80
Net income (loss) 
including XFL and
the World
$58.91 

$15.99


$42.23


-$(19.20)

$48.2 
Net income (loss) 
excluding XFL and
the World
$59.58 
$62.90
$37.60 
$16.1
$49.6  
EBIDTA
$87.24
$92.92
$55.23
$37.6
$85.9
Attendance
2,485,100
2,449,8002,032,7541,815,1001,647,900
Events
206
212237327329
Profit Contribution %
41.9%
43.1%38.7%36.6%44.8%
EBIDTA %
23.1%
21.1%13.5%10.0%22.9%


START5/1/20045/1/20051/1/20061/1/20071/1/2008
END
4/30/2005
4/30/2006
12/31/2006
12/31/2007
12/31/2008
FISCAL YEAR
FY2005
FY2006
CY2006
CY2007
CY2008
PPV EVENTS
14
16
16
15
14
PPV BUYS
5,280,800
6,241,100
5,744,000
5,218,000
5,034,400
REVENUE
$366.43
$400.05
$415.30
$485.66
$526.46
Profit Contribution
$153.10
$172.90
$170.40
$186.90
$214.70
Net income (loss)
$39.10
$47.05
$48.80
$52.14
$45.42
EBIDTA
$62.20
$81.00
$74.30
$77.80
$83.40
ATTENDANCE
1,617,430
1,713,840
1,975,500
2,115,300
2,203,300
EVENTS
325
300
308
308
319
Profit Contribution %
41.8%
43.2%
41.0%
38.5%
40.8%
EBIDTA %
17.0%
20.2%
17.9%
16.0%
15.8%

START1/1/20091/1/20101/1/20111/1/20121/1/2013
END
12/31/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
12/31/2013
FISCAL YEAR
CY2009
CY2010
CY2011
CY2012
CY2013
EVENTS
14
13
13
12
12
PPV BUYS
4,490,200
3,631,100
3,842,100
4,023,000
3,838,000
REVENUE
$475.16
$477.60
$483.90
$484.00
$508.00
Profit Contribution
$219.30
$203.40
$168.70
$199.60

Net income (loss)
$50.30
$53.50
$24.80
$31.40
$2.80
EBIDTA
$91.60
$94.00
$52.00
$63.20
$30.40
ATTENDANCE
2,383,800
2,155,700
1,976,500
1,854,100
1,919,500
EVENTS
342
327
321
314
321
Profit Contribution %
46.2%
42.6%
34.9%
41.2%

EBIDTA %
19.3%
19.7%
10.7%
13.1%
6.0%

Notes:
  • Information was pulled from a combination of SEC filings, Trending Schedules and WWE Investor Presentations
  • Note that while all periods are 12 months, 2006 is represented twice - a FY2006 (May 2005-April 2006) and a CY2006 (Jan 2006-Dec 2006)
  • In 2013 the company switched from EBITDA to OIBDA but retained the same calculation. Profit Contribution was not listed on the 2013 Trending Schedule.
  • Various charges 
    • XFL and The World: $1.4M (FY2004), $35.6M (FY2003), $0.3M (FY2002), $48.5M (FY2001), $0.7M (FY2000)
    • Hotel/Casino: bought $10.9M (FY1999), sold $11.3M (FY2000)
    • WWE Studios: $11.7M (CY2013), $1.3M (CY2012), $23.4M (CY2011), $1.9M (CY2008), $15.7M (CY2007)
    • Reversal of accrued licensing agent commissions: -$7.9M (FY2004)
    • Legal Settlements: $7.0M (FY2001), $6.2M (FY2003), -$5.9M (FY2004)
    • Early Termination of Office Space Lease: $0.7M (FY2003)
  • On the 2/20/14 Conference Call, CFO George Barrios noted that WWE had spent about $12M on WWE Network development in 2013 which along with the film impairment charges is likely what drove the major dip in EBITDA/OIBDA and Net Income in 2013.

Revenue Streams by Segment


START5/1/19995/1/20005/1/20015/1/20025/1/2003
END
4/30/2000
4/30/2001
4/30/2002
4/30/2003
4/30/2004
FISCAL YEAR
FY2000
FY2001
FY2002
FY2003
FY2004
PPV
$106.40
$128.20
$112.00
$91.10
$95.30
Live Events
$68.90
$82.00
$74.50
$72.90
$70.20
TV Rights
$12.10
$35.30
$53.30
$58.50
$71.00
Advertising
$77.90
$90.20
$83.70
$72.90
$59.50
Licensing + Other
$43.70
$37.40
$24.40
$22.50
$22.60
Home Entertainment
$20.00
$12.20
$13.60
$13.80
$21.40
Merchandise
$21.50
$22.00
$26.20
$22.50
$18.60
Publishing
$16.20
$18.40
$17.60
$15.20
$10.70
WWE.com
$11.10
$12.50
$4.40
$4.90
$5.60

START5/1/20045/1/20051/1/20061/1/20071/1/2008
END
4/30/2005
4/30/2006
12/31/2006
12/31/2007
12/31/2008
FISCAL YEAR
FY2005
FY2006
CY2006
CY2007
CY2008
PPV
$85.50
$94.80
$93.60
$94.30
$91.40
Live Events
$78.70
$75.00
$83.70
$99.30
$105.70
TV Rights
$78.00
$81.50
$85.50
$92.40
$100.70
Advertising
$43.70
$22.60
$7.40
$5.90
$7.40
Licensing + Other
$21.60
$32.70
$32.70
$47.90
$61.80
Home Entertainment
$20.10
$42.60
$49.90
$53.70
$58.50
Merchandise
$18.00
$27.90
$35.50
$37.70
$37.00
Publishing
$12.20
$11.10
$12.40
$16.50
$15.40
WWE.com
$7.80
$9.70
$11.00
$16.20
$16.30
WWE Studios
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$16.00
$24.50
WWE 24/7
$0.80
$2.20
$3.60
$5.80
$7.80

START1/1/20091/1/20101/1/20111/1/20121/1/2013
END
12/31/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
12/31/2013
FISCAL YEAR
CY2009
CY2010
CY2011
CY2012
CY2013
PPV
$80.00
$70.20
$78.30
$83.60
$82.50
Live Events
$108.80
$104.60
$104.70
$103.70
$111.50
TV Rights
$111.90
$127.00
$131.50
$139.50
$160.90
Advertising
$7.70
$5.90
$1.10
$1.40
$2.50
Licensing + Other
$46.80
$54.30
$56.80
$48.80
$46.40
Home Entertainment
$39.40
$32.10
$30.40
$33.00
$24.30
Merchandise
$35.80
$32.40
$33.90
$33.60
$34.90
Publishing
$13.50
$11.00
$7.70
$6.00
$5.70
WWE.com
$16.80
$14.90
$12.50
$19.70
$23.00
WWE Studios
$7.70
$19.60
$20.90
$7.90
$10.80
WWE COD
$6.80
$5.60
$6.10
$6.80
$5.50

Notes:
  • Information was pulled from a combination of SEC filings, Trending Schedules and WWE Investor Presentations
  • Note that while all periods are 12 months, 2006 is represented twice - a FY2006 (May 2005-April 2006) and a CY2006 (Jan 2006-Dec 2006)
  • I would recommend looking at TV Rights+Advertising together.  TV Rights represent both domestic and international TV Rights deals.
  • Merchandise is a combination of Venue Merchandise and WWEShop and Catalog Sales
  • Licensing + Other is Licensing plus Consumer Products Other
  • WWE 24/7 is really the Live and Televised Entertainment Other category (which included WWE Classics on Demand, fka WWE 24/7)
Please feel free to use these numbers for your own analysis and articles! 

It would be kind that if should you choose to use these numbers as a "source of truth", please link back to this page.  I've tried my best to verify the numbers, and where there were changes, use the latest version of the data.  I will try to post corrections and additional information here in the future.

-Chris Harrington
twitter: @mookieghana
email: chris.harrington@gmail.com

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

WWE Raw Ratings (three year look) with graphs by wrestler

I wrote a new piece at WhatCulture looking at the top Raw Viewership movers over a three-year period.  I refreshed all of my data and included some rating change calculations (as opposed to just viewership #s) so I would have a deeper dataset that covered more weeks.  Then I made an Excel macro that looked at the trending data (red dots) vs individual observations (blue dots) for the top 90 appearing wrestlers which you can see by clicking on individual's names.  (Full piece up at https://sites.google.com/site/chrisharrington/mookieghana-prowrestlingstatistics/wwe_raw_ratings_2011_2013 )

Wrestler Count  Average 
AJ 48 3,354
Aksana 9 (293,667)
Alberto Del Rio 119 25,218
Alex Riley 37 161,911
Alicia Fox 29 (188,556)
Antonio Cesaro 44 (139,364)
Battle Royal 18 78,166
Beth Phoenix 20 (125,200)
Big E Langston 15 (95,267)
Big Show 74 158,822
Brad Maddox 16 178,813
Bray Wyatt 10 (178,600)
Brie Bella 39 (252,796)
Brock Lesnar 23 450,435
Brodus Clay 48 (75,083)
Chris Jericho 58 78,840
Christian 34 (36,176)
CM Punk 158 272,788
Cody Rhodes 71 (104,573)
Curtis Axel 14 222,786
Damien Sandow 47 (164,000)
Daniel Bryan 142 47,800
Darren Young 28 (129,571)
David Otunga 51 (46,911)
Dean Ambrose 50 154,048
Dolph Ziggler 140 (25,618)
Drew McIntyre 27 (167,082)
Edge 14 122,484
Epico 22 (208,955)
Evan Bourne 26 (233,437)
Eve Torres 61 (82,497)
Ezekiel Jackson 10 62,095
Fandango 26 (204,308)
Great Khali 31 (107,965)
Heath Slater 53 (62,335)
HHH 58 349,119
Jack Swagger 89 (120,165)
Jerry Lawler 29 158,108
Jim Ross 9 417,657
Jinder Mahal 29 (156,138)
John Cena 201 389,007
John Laurinaitis 37 219,892
John Morrison 45 (86,383)
Justin Gabriel 23 13,998
Kaitlyn 26 (77,846)
Kane 93 50,746
Kelly Kelly 29 (191,425)
Kofi Kingston 90 (188,258)
Layla 26 (231,994)
Mark Henry 68 48,779
Maryse 13 (148,950)
Mason Ryan 9 (226,111)
Melina 12 (105,809)
Michael Cole 27 84,462
Michael McGillicutty 18 (293,749)
Mick Foley 9 543,000
Miz 151 125,606
Naomi 11 (364,364)
Natalya 34 (203,896)
Nexus 9 149,892
Nikki Bella 31 (265,131)
Paul Heyman 50 319,540
Primo 24 (192,125)
Randy Orton 112 102,425
Rey Mysterio 39 8,340
Ricardo Rodriguez 13 (29,462)
Rock 35 431,514
Roman Reigns 50 170,528
R-Truth 94 12,302
RVD 9 (52,000)
Ryback 64 104,469
Santino Marella 74 (208,406)
Seth Rollins 51 160,753
Shawn Michaels 16 267,188
Sheamus 125 11,769
Sin Cara 37 (65,865)
Stephanie McMahon 15 167,667
Tamina 12 (88,984)
Ted DiBiase 18 (95,475)
Tensai 38 (48,421)
Titus O'Neil 28 (138,500)
Tyson Kidd 20 (103,444)
Undertaker 15 474,933
Usos 22 (194,307)
Vickie Guerrero 52 89,955
Vince McMahon 25 334,790
Vladimir Kozlov 12 (11,460)
Wade Barrett 65 66,828
Zack Ryder 66 (170,888)
Zeb Colter 9 (87,556)

Please note that these numbers are over three years, include overrun, are evenly weighted and include some noise (such as video packages).  I've said it before and I'll say it again: It's an imperfect science.  But there's some interesting things to be see, particularly in the 3-month trend lines.

For instance, look at R-Truth:


You can see how when he started working against Cena & the Rock, his numbers were huge.  Then they returned to normal, which is no real impact.  This says a lot that if WWE puts you in the spotlight, especially in the overrun segment, you're going to seem like a star.  The question is just can you make a difference over the long run, especially when you're not in just in the top slot?

Another interesting test case is Mark Henry.  .  


When he's treated like a main eventer, there's flashes of being a big deal, but other times, he's just another guy

It's easy to contrast that with John Cena who is always large and in charge.  


This is a three-month trending line (with a minimum of four appearance to earn a red dot) so you'll see a complete line even though Cena has been out periodically for his injuries.

And if we're going to talk about top guys, behold Randall Orton:

At live events he certainly gets loud reactions, but he hasn't been someone who meant a lot over the long haul, at least not since 2012.  You do see the swell towards the end of the dataset (which went through 10/7/13) where he was increasingly returning the top of the card to feud with (who else) John Cena and Big Show.

Speaking of Paul Wight:

Big Show actually made my top 16 positive rating movers list.
That's unlike some of the newer faces - Dolph Ziggler, Big E Langston, Cesaro, Fandango, Sandow:



Then you have the divas, which are often put in the death spot.  And it shows.


Next to Cena, CM Punk was probably the next regular performer with a strong track record:


The other proven group was The Shield (i'll show three, but it's all really the same story):

Lastly, there's Mr. Beardhat. (Seriously, what the hell?!)
Daniel Bryan's numbers aren't stunning.  Again, it's going to be function of when you're pushed and when you're in the overrun segments, but until the last quarter, he was below average.  However, the wild swings suggest there might be some momentum and future for him as a top level guy; we'll just have to see how it plays out!

Certainly, some food for thought.